The So-Called Creative PhD: Is There Another Type – or Not?

Is There Another Type – or Not?

Abstract

This paper constitutes a short reflection on architectural research and knowledge production in the tertiary education sector, with particular reference to the establishment of a ‘creative’ PhD degree in South Africa. It arises from the growing interest in and pressure for the establishment of a practice-led (architecture) PhD. This interest has emerged predominantly from within performance-based disciplines whose application takes the form of practice-based and professionally produced work. In reflecting on the nature of PhDs and on various ‘alternative’ approaches, I conclude that the conventional PhD implicitly infers creativity and is entirely capable of sponsoring any performance-based PhD enquiry – particularly within practice-based disciplines in which theory and method have been critically identified to support appropriate investigations. Concern is therefore raised regarding the emerging predominance of an author’s self-evaluation of their own ‘creative’ production at the level of a PhD enquiry. On the one hand, knowledge remains largely embedded within the performance/production, and on the other hand, the subjectivity intrinsic to autoethnographic studies is noted for its privileging of the self over the other, and its method often follows what may be termed a self-fulfilling prophesy.