Blended Learning Strategies for Advertising Design Studies

Authors

  • Gladys Lam Wai Ling City University of Hong Kong

Downloads

DOI:

10.31182/cubic.2021.4.037

Keywords:

blended learning approach, design studio pedagogy, student learning experience, student perception, meaningful feedback

Abstract

Technological developments have brought profound challenges to design education. To understand how design educators adapt to new technological directions, this article examines student feedback from advertising design courses that apply blended learning approaches. This study identified three blended learning strategies conducive to meaningful learning: timely and meaningful feedback; engagement with real world tasks; and support from expert tutors. This article also discusses potential resistance and challenges in implementing instruction in blended technological environments.

How to Cite

Lam Wai Ling, G. (2021). Blended Learning Strategies for Advertising Design Studies. Cubic Journal, 4(4), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.31182/cubic.2021.4.037

Published

2021-11-01

Issue

No. 4 (2021): Design Education — The Role of Technology in Reforming Design Education — Pedagogy · Critique · Transformation

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Gladys Lam Wai Ling, City University of Hong Kong

Gladys Lam worked in advertising for 16 years and served as a creative director of international 4As agencies, winning numerous awards worldwide before joining the Department of Communication Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University in 2006. She taught a variety of advertising design and creativity subjects and supervised honours projects. In addition, Gladys introduced new courses for the school and interdisciplinary general education, presenting the paper in the Global Conference on General Education and University Curriculum Reform at City University of Hong Kong in 2012. She has also published research findings in American Academy of Advertising Global Conference Proceedings. Her current research interests include advertising visual and copy strategies, advertising design and creativity education.

References

Beetham, Helen, and Rhona Sharpe. Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning. London: Routledge, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078952

Boud, David, and Michael Prosser. “Key Principles for High Quality Student Learning in Higher Education: A framework for Evaluation.” Educational Media International 39, no. 3 (2002): 237-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980210166026

Brook, Christopher, and Ron Oliver. 2004. “Online Learning Communities: Exploring the Impact of Group Size on Community Development.” Paper presented at Ed-Media 2004, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Lugano, Switzerland, June 21-26, 2004.

Creswell, John W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among 5 Traditions. San Francisco, CA: Sage Publications, 2013.

Fischer, Thomas. “The Past and Future of Studio Culture.” Appeared in the October 15 2004 issue of ArchVoices.

Garrison, Randy D., and Heather Kanuka. “Blended Learning: Uncovering its Transformative Potential in Higher Education.” Internet and Higher Education 7, no. 2 (2004): 95–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Herrington, Jane, Tom C. Reeves, and Ron Oliver. “Creating Authentic Learning Environments through Blended Learning Approaches.” In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, ed. Curtis Bonk and Charles Graham. (New York: Jossey Bass, 2005), 502-517.

Hokanson, Brad. “The design critique as a model for distributed learning.” In The Next Generation of Distance Education, Boston: Springer, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1785-9_5

Kintu, Justice M., Chang Zhu and Edmond Kagambe. “Blended Learning Effectiveness: The Relationship between Student Characteristics, Design Features and Outcomes.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14, no.7 (2017). DOI 10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4

Ma, Henry. “Study of Blended Learning Approach for Project-Based Learning.” Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Social Sciences Conference, Kyoto, Japan, November 22-24, 2015.

Markoff, Monique. “Blended Learning and the Future of Education.” Youtube TEDx Talks. Published on May 6, 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mb2d8E1dZjY.

Meyer, Katrina A. “Face-to-face versus Threaded Discussions: The Role of Time and Higher-order Thinking.” Asynchronous Learning Networks 7, no. 3 (2003): 55–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i3.1845

Mitcham, Carl. “Dasein versus design: The problematics of turning making into thinking.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11, no.1 (2001): 27-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011282121513

Moustakas, Clark. Phenomenological Research Methods. London: Sage Publications, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658

Oh, Jae E., Jeffrey C. F. Ho, Chris Shaw, and Justin Chan. “Engaging Creative Media Students’ Motivation: The Influence of Autonomy, Peer Relationships, and Opportunities in the Industry” World Journal of Education 8, no. 6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n6p1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n6p1

Picciano, Antony G., Charles D. Dziuban, and Charles R. Graham. Blended Learning: Research Perspectives. Volume 2. New York: Routledge, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880310

Ruhl, Joe. “Teaching Methods for Inspiring the Students of the Future: What’s love got to do with it?” Youtube TEDx Talks. Published on May 27, 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCFg9bcW7Bk.

Sanders, Elizabeth B. N., and Pieter J. Stappers. “Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4, no.1 (2008): 5-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

Wenzel, Thomas J. “AC Educator: Using mistakes as learning opportunities.” Analytical Chemistry 74, no.15 (2002): 439-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac022078z