Urban Displacements of the Human
Downloads
DOI:
10.31182/cubic.2018.1.007Keywords:
Urban Displacement, Socialisation, Governance, Contestation, Design SocialAbstract
Social, historical and architectural research on urbanization processes in the Global South have increasingly valorized the contributions of an “urban majority” — a heuristic composite of working poor, working and lower middle class residents — to the formation of intricate repertoires of built forms, economic practices, infrastructures of affect, and collective sensibilities. Despite oscillating registers of structural violence, colonial residue, geopolitical instability, and systematic dispossession, metropolitan landscapes of the South are replete with an incessantly recalibrated intensity of working with and through uncertainty to deliver ways of life that skirt precarity. The auto-construction of the majority is usually associated with particular forms and practices. If the territories of operation usually associated with this urban majority may find themselves increasingly hemmed in by countervailing forces, is it possible to imagine new forms through which the “archives” of their capacities might be expressed? By intervening into the increasingly formatted, homogenized venues of residential and commercial space, it is possible to conceive new possibilities of the ways in which “majority life” can be re-enacted, but in a manner that strategically modulates the very ways in which that life is made visible.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 AbdouMaliq Simone

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Amin, Ash. “Animated space.” In Public Culture 27 (2015): 239-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2841844
Amoore, Louise. “Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror.” Political Geography 25 (2006): 336–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001
Amoore, Louise. “Cloud Geographies Computing, Data, Sovereignty.” Progress in Human Geography (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516662147
Amoore, Louise, and Volha Piotukh. “Life Beyond Big Data: Governing with Little Analytics.” In Economy and Society 44 (2015): 341-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1043793
Anwar, Nausheen. “Urban transformations: brokers, collaborative governance and community-building in Karachi’s periphery.” South Asia History and Culture 5 (2014): 75-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2013.863011
Bahn, Gautam. In the Public’s Interest: Evictions, Citizenship and Inequality in Contemporary Delhi. Delhi: Orient BlackSwan, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book49012
Bair, Jennifer and Marion Werner. “The Place of Disarticulations: Global Commodity Production in La Laguna, Mexico.” Environment and Planning A 43 (2011): 998-1015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a43404
Bayat Asef. Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053569115
Bear, Laura. “Doubt, conflict, mediation: the anthropology of modern time.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20, Issue Supplement s.1 (2014): 3-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12091
Benjamin, Solomon. “Cities within and beyond the plan.” Cities in South Asia. Edited by Crispin Bates and Mio Minoru. London and New York: Routledge, 2015.
Berndt, Christian. “Assembling market borders: violence, dispossession, and economic development in Ciudad Jurez, Mexico.” Environment and Planning A 45 (2013): 2646 – 2662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a45690
Betts, R. and Robert Ross, eds. Colonial Cities: Essays on Urbanism in Colonial Context. New York: Springer, 1985.
Boudreau, Julie-Anne and Diane E. Davis. “Introduction: A Processual Approach to Informalization.” Current Sociology (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116657286
Braun, Bruce. “A New Urban Dispositif? Governing Life in Age of Climate Change.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (2014): 49 – 64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d4313
Blom Hansen, Thomas, and Oskar Verkaaik. “Introduction—Urban Charisma: On Everyday Mythologies in the City.” Critique of Anthropology 29 (2009): 5-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X08101029
Brenner, Neil, and Christian Schmid. "The 'urban age' in question." International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (2014): 731-755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12115
Caldeira, Teresa. “Peripheral ubanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities ofthe global south.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816658479
Colebrook, Claire. “What is it like to be Human?” Transgender Studies Quarterly 2 (2015): 227-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2867472
Datta, Ayona. The Illegal City: Space, law and gender in a Delhi Squatter Settlement. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.
Davis, Diane E. “The Social Construction of Mexico City: Political Conflict and Urban Development, 1950-1966.” Journal of Urban History 24 (1998): 364–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009614429802400304
Dill, Brian. “The Paradoxes of Community-Based Participation in Dar Es Salaam.” Development and Change 40, (2009): 717–743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01569.x
Farias, Ignacio, and Anders Blok. “Technical Democracy as a Challenge to Urban Studies.” City 20 (2016): 539-548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2016.1192418
Fawaz, Mona. “An Unusual Clique of City-Makers: Social Networks in the Production of a Neighborhood in Beirut.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (2008): 565–585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00812.x
Gabrys, Jennifer. “Programming Environments: Environmentality and Citizen Sensing in the Smart City.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (2014): 30-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d16812
Gago, Vernica. “Financialization of Popular Life and the Extractive Operations of Capital: A Perspective from Argentina.” South Atlantic Quarterly 114 (2015): 11-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831257
Ghertner, D. Asher. “India’s urban revolution: geographies of displacement beyond gentrification.” Environment and Planning A 46 (2014): 1554 – 1571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a46288
Gidwani, Vinay, and Anant Maringanti. “The Waste-Value Dialectic: Lumpen Urbanization in Contemporary India.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 36 (2016): 112-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201x-3482159
Graham, Stephen, and Colin McFarlane, eds. Infrastructural Lives: Urban Infrastructure in Context. New York; London: Routledge, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775098
Hansen, Mark. “Engineering preindividual potentiality: technics, transindividuation, and 21st century media.” Substance 41 (2012): 32–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2012.0025
Harms, Erik. “Eviction Time in the New Saigon: Temporalities of Displacement in the Rubble of Development.” Cultural Anthropology 28 (2013): 344–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cuan.12007
Hayles, N. Katherine. “Cognitive Assemblages: Technical Agency and Human Interactions.” Critical Inquiry 42 (2016): 32-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/688293
Holston, James. “Autoconstruction in Working-Class Brazil.” Cultural Anthropology 6 (1991):447-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1991.6.4.02a00020
Hunt, Stacey. “Citizenship’s Place: The State’s Creation of Public Space and Street Vendors’ Culture of Informality in Bogot., Colombia.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27 (2009): 331–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d1806
Jaglin, Sylvy. “Regulating service delivery in Southern cities: re-thinking urban heterogeneity.’” In The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South, eds. S. Parnell and S. Oldfied. London; New York: Routledge, 2014.
King, Anthony. Colonial Urban Development: Culture, Social Power and Environment. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976.
King, Ross. “Bangkok Space, and Conditions of Possibility.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26, no.2 (2008): 315–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/dking
Legg, Stephen. “Ambivalent Improvements: Biography, Biopolitics, and Colonial Delhi.” Environment and Planning A 40 (2008): 37–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a38460
Lepawsky, Josh, Grace Akese, Mostaem Billah, Creighton Conolly, and Chris McNabb. “Composing Urban Orders from Rubbish Electronics: Cityness and the Site Multiple.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39, (2015): 185-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12142
Leszczynski, Agnieszka. “Speculative futures: Cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism.” Environment and Planning A 48 (2016): 1691-1708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16651445
Lindell, Ilda. “The Multiple Sites of Urban Governance: Insights from an African City.” Urban Studies 45 (2008): 1879–1901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008093382
McFarlane, Colin. “The Geographies of Urban Density: Topology, Politics, and the City.” Progress in Human Geography 40 (2016): 629-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515608694
McFarlane, Colin. “Governing the Colonial City: Infrastructure and Sanitation in Colonial and Postcolonial Bombay.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (2008): 415–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00793.x
McFarlane, Colin. Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343434
MacKenzie, Adrian. “Digital Sociology in the Field of Devices.” In Routledge International Handbook of Sociology of Art and Culture. Edited by L. Hanquinet and M. Savage. London; New York: Routledge, 2015.
Mezzadra, Sandro, and Brett Neilson. “Operations of Capita.” South Atlantic Quarterly 114 (2015): 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831246
Minuchin, Leandro. “The Politics of Construction: Towards a Theory of Material Articulations.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (2016): 895-913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816634347
Neild, Susan. “Colonial Urbanism: The Development of Madras City in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries.” Modern Asian Studies 13 (1979): 217–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00008301
Nielsen, Morten. “Contrapuntal Cosmopolitanism: Distantiation as Social Relatedness among Housebuilders in Maputo, Mozambique.” Social Anthropology 18, no. 4 (2010): 396–402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2010.00122.x
Nuijten, Monique. “The perversity of the 'citizenship game': slum-upgrading in the urban periphery of Recife, Brazil.” Critique of Anthropology 33 (2013): 8–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X12466683
Perera, Nihal. People’s Spaces: Coping, Familiarizing, Creating. New York and London: Routledge, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315867069
Perera, Nihal. “People’s Spaces: Familiarization, Subject Formation and Emergent Spaces in Colombo.” Planning Theory 8 (2009): 51–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099298
Perlman, Janice. Favela: Four Decades of Living on the Edge in Rio de Janeiro. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Ruddick, Sue. “Situating the Anthropocene: Planetary Urbanization and the Anthropological Machine.” Urban Geography 36 (2015): 1113–1130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1071993
Scott, David. “Colonial Governmentality.” In Anthropologies of Modernity: Foucault, Governmentality, and Life Politics. Edited by . J. X. Inda. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2005.
Singerman, Diane. Cairo Contested: Governance, Urban Space, and Global Modernity. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5743/cairo/9789774162886.001.0001
Stiegler, Bernard. Taking Care: of Youth and the Generations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010.
Sundaram, Ravi. Pirate Modernity: Dehli’s Media Urbanism. London and Delhi: Routledge, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875421
Sundaram, Ravi. “Publicity, Transparency, and the Circulation Engine.” Current Anthropology 56, no. S12 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/683300
Szeman, Imre. “Entrepreneurship as the New Common Sense.”South Atlantic Quarterly 114 (2015): 471–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3130701
Telles, Vera Da Silva, and Daniel Veloso Hirata. “The city and urban practices: in the uncertain frontiers between the illegal, the informal, and the illicit.” Estudos Avançados 21 (2007): 173–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142007000300012
Thatcher, Jim, David O’Sullivan, and Dillon Mahmoudi. “Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (2016): 990–1006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816633195
Valayden, Diren. “Racial Feralization: Targeting Race in the Age of ‘Planetary Urbanization’.” Theory, Culture & Society 33 (2016): 159–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416668976
Vasudevan, Alexander. “The Makeshift City: Towards a Global Geography of Squatting. Progress.” Human Geography 39 (2015): 338-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514531471
Vigar, Sarwat. “Constructing Lyari: place, governance, and identity in a Karachi neighbourhood.” South Asia History and Culture 5, no. 3 (2014): 365–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2014.905335
Weinstein, Lisa.“Demolition and dispossession: toward understanding of state violence in millennial Mumbai.” Studies in Comparative International Development 48, no. 3 (2013): 285–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-013-9136-9
Weinstein, Lisa. “Mumbai ’s Development Mafias: Globalization, Organized Crime and Land Development.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (2008): 22–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00766.x
Weinstein, Lisa. “One-Man Handled: Fragmented Power and Political Entrepreneurship in Globalizing Mumbai,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38, no. 1 (2014): 14-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12040
Zeiderman, Austin. Endangered City: The Politics of Security and Risk in Bogota. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11g97hx